Thoughts about the cartoon «Wild ancestors»

“Wild ancestors” is one of those films that you look at and like to scold even awkwardly: the story is simple as three kopecks, but it works out all the necessary basic elements, and in some places there are good jokes and pun, the animation does not represent anything amazing, but made sweet, pleasantly and, most importantly, manually sophisticated. In general, its own limit program is more or less worked out. And, it seems, everything is so even, sweetly that it’s a pity to burden.

But then you remember that it is, it seems, like a cartoon from the same studio and the same director that Walles and Grumita made and “escape from the chicken coop”. And here we are entering the territory of bewilderment: this is what they took off after a long silence, starting from 2014?

The problem is not so much that the “wild ancestors” were fed somewhere or did not give something, the problem is that the whole tape, in principle, passes in relation to the viewer on the tangent, and it is very difficult to catch on anything in it.

For example, the world of history is revealed before us through a promising entry. We see how the hero from his primitive jungle first falls into the jungle of stone, and it is really interesting to observe this. They carefully show him as a small bug in a huge anthill, where everything that is commonplace for us is frightening and strange. This is supplemented by the fact that the bronze city is furnished as a kind of civilian mordor (in which it is easy to see a parallel with our own reality).

In a couple of minutes, we pass by a heap of different locations, there is a series of situations tied to the “primitiveness” of the hero, and we are wondering what they will do with all this further. Unfortunately, the answer is more prosaic than we would like: instead of expanding this world or revealing new details of the everyday life of bronze people, the authors are narrowed with each subsequent visit of the hero to the city, taking away the final fight to the final (they also bring the “primitive” commentators of the match so that everything is completely obvious).

The story about how https://casinojokabet.uk/ a disquailed tribe gathers into the team, learns the feeling of the elbow and at the end overlaps the enemy superior in strength, the authors, in my opinion, also did not take it to the end. That is, in general terms, everything is in it, but in detail it contradicts its own morality.

The protagonist decides to make a deal with the Glavgad about the softening of the conditions of defeat, without consulting with any of his fellow tribesmen, without even explaining the situation, although he should be the mouthpiece that translates the ideas about the “sensation of the elbow” and honesty in the team. And they easily forgive him, just like that.

You can say that I find fault with the little things. But, excuse me, this is what children watch, including babies, and what kind of idea should it give them? That you can safely take the right to make decisions on behalf of the entire team, and even if you are screwed up, then they will easily go to you?

In general, the tribe from which the main character comes from, does not cause much sympathy: they all behave like cowardly, capricious children, each of whom is busy only and does not notice the rest at point blank range. Yes, in the end they put on shape and play on the field of combination with the ball, but I personally did not see changes in them.

These are not fatal flaws, but from these details there is a lack of involvement in history, a feeling of insincerity with the audience and the scent of the final result. The feeling that your hour and a half went to something that did not cause you either joy or irritation, but just this time flew into a certain black hole, behind which there is nothing.

In fact, all this cart is about a rather mediocre cartoon, which will be forgotten in a month – this is nothing more than an excuse to talk about what in essence means the concept of “strong middle peasant”, which everyone loves to scatter, especially reviewers?

From what tests are blind such projects as “Mary and Witch Flower” from former Miyazaki’s colleagues, “The secret dossier” of Spielberg, “shorter” by Alexander Payne and many other creations that disappear as quickly as they appear not because they are objectively bad, but simply because there is nothing about anything?

From my personal experience I can say that usually many problems begin with the words “to do as cool as. «. In the same “wild ancestors”, Nick is as if afraid to move away from old works: here and there, references jump out to “Wallas and Gromita”, then direct quotes from the “shooting from the chicken coop”, and they carry an intonation by the type of “Oh! Hey! Do you remember those our previous cartoons that are much cooler «?

I repeat, most of my giving way proceeds from what I know and appreciate the cartoons of this studio. Excessive expectations syndrome? Yes, but I’m not shy! I know that this team can be better.

Suitable for revision – no
Cool picture – yes
Originality – no
Easy to watch – yes